Nix has issued a statement regarding his conflict with Morf
Author: Hawk Live LLC
Last updated:

Alexander “Nix” Levin believes he is in the right in his conflict with blogger Morf, as the latter regularly distorted the streamer’s statements and created a negative image of him on his channel.
The streamer made the statement on Telegram.
“I’ll lay out my position without emotion or fluff so you can look at the situation objectively and draw your own conclusions.
I have never been opposed to constructive criticism. For years, the media and tens or hundreds of thousands of people have discussed my views, my lifestyle, how I stream, and many other things—that’s fine. If I took such things to heart, I would have developed health problems long ago, and you would see a lot of gray hair.
In Morf’s case, it’s not about criticism or a neutral stance, but about manipulation and distortion of facts. For several years, he’s been taking my words out of context, making up facts, failing to understand the situation, and passing superficial judgments (like with Streamers Battle, for example), using neural networks to make me look like a freak in previews, and presenting everything in a way that suits him so his content gets more hype. In accordance with all the tenets of tabloid media.
And I, like any sane person, simply ran out of patience. When you distort facts and use content from a stream to trash someone—in my view, that’s unethical use and an inhumane, biased attitude.”
According to Alexander “Nix” Levin’s statement, he filed a strike against Morf’s video together with Timur “Travoman” Khafizov and Umn1k not out of personal resentment, but because of the blogger’s actions, which the streamer considers unethical. The content creator believes that Morf regularly distorts the facts in his investigations and uses Nix’s statements out of context.
As a reminder, the conflict between Alexander “Nix” Levin and Morf arose after the blogger used a video featuring the streamer’s comments about Alexey “Solo” Berezin. The esports player had previously expressed his opinion on the situation.





